The Rolling Stones? More like the rolling boulders..

As humans, we are known for judging other things and our vast curiosity of the world. So tell me, what category of music should The Rolling Stones be in? Dog doo doo or "England's Newest Hitmakers"? Sorry to come off disrespectful but really, it's an honest question. I think they are like a rotten apple, still a apple but not as good as it was. Maybe I judge too quickly, maybe I haven't listen enough of them to give an answer. WRONG! I listened to their first album all the way through, and I don't know about you, but I find a trash sandwich more satisfying than what I had heard.

You might say "Well, it is their first album. You can't expect greatness out of the first". WRONG! When you call yourself "England's Newest Hitmakers", I expect more than album full of covers and one original. And to think I was going to get a subscription for Rolling Stone Magazines. What, they band and the magazines aren't related in anyway? TRUE! I searched it up on Google and I'm leaving that sentence in, just for you to see how ignorant and arrogant I am. All jokes aside, their first album was garbage to my ears. Sure, It was monumental in music history but I just can't bring myself to appreciate it. I respect those who do, every person has a different opinion over it.

I'll listen to some works The Rolling Stones later did to broaden my musical sense. But I DO NOT RECOMMEND listening to "England's Newest Hitmakers" to relax your mind because honestly, you're just gonna get a concussion hearing it. I DO ,however, RECOMMEND listening to it for a good laugh.

EX: